The legal landscape in Ghana has been stirred by a recent lawsuit filed by Elorm Kwami Gorni, a private citizen, seeking a declaration from the Supreme Court that the legal vacation observed by the Superior Courts is unconstitutional. Gorni, in a writ filed last Friday, August 7, 2026, is demanding that the highest court of the land strike down the complete suspension of sittings by the Superior Courts during the legal vacation period. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of the Attorney-General and the Chief Justice, centers around inconsistencies with the Constitution, specifically Articles 1(2), 19(1), 23, 33, 125 and 296, arguing that the suspension violates fundamental rights. The core of Gorni’s request is for the court to order the Chief Justice to implement rotational vacation sittings to ensure the Superior Courts continue hearing and determining cases throughout the year.
The lawsuit alleges that the suspension of sittings, beginning August 1st and concluding September 30th each year, denies litigants their constitutional right to a fair hearing within a reasonable timeframe. Mr. Gorni contends that this action constitutes unfair administrative action, effectively nullifying the right of appeal, and creates an illusory continuity of two-month periods of suspension for litigants. He specifically challenges the application of Rule 61(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules and Rule 82 of the Supreme Court Rules, arguing they permit the two courts to suspend sittings without proper authorization, thereby infringing upon the constitutional right to a fair hearing.
The crux of Gorni’s argument rests on the lack of less restrictive alternatives. He advocates for rotational sittings, staggered judicial leave, or specially constituted vacation panels, suggesting that the increased number of Justices on the Superior Courts bench renders a blanket suspension impractical and disproportionate. The lawsuit also highlights the potential for increased judicial workload, potentially leading to a diminished quality of justice. The court is being asked to consider whether the suspension of sittings is a necessary measure or an overreach of judicial power, and whether the Constitution adequately protects litigants’ rights during this period. The case is expected to have significant implications for the balance of power between the Superior Courts and the Supreme Court in Ghana, and the potential ramifications for judicial proceedings.
The legal team representing Mr. Gorni has submitted a detailed analysis of the Constitution and its provisions, demonstrating a clear violation of established legal principles. The Chief Justice’s office has indicated they are reviewing the lawsuit and will provide a formal response within the stipulated timeframe. The Supreme Court’s decision on this matter will undoubtedly shape the administration of justice in Ghana and impact the rights of litigants.
This case exemplifies a growing concern within the legal community regarding the potential for administrative action to unduly impact the judicial process, and the need to balance the interests of the courts with the fundamental rights of citizens. The impact of this ruling will be closely watched by legal professionals and observers across the nation.
Watch Related Video
Source: Graphic Online
